|
 | |
PROOF THAT THE WORLD TRADE CENTER WAS DELIBERATELY DEMOLISHED
by MAD MAX
Friday, Jul. 18, 2003 at 11:01 PM
All that one needs to know, to be able to conclusively prove that the Twin Towers were demolished, is that the towers fell in roughly 10 seconds, that is, that they fell at about the same rate that an object falls through air.
PROOF THAT THE WORLD TRADE CENTER WAS DELIBERATELY DEMOLISHED.
EVIDENCE: BOTH OF THE TOWERS FELL IN ABOUT 10 SECONDS.
PROOF:
All that one needs to know, to be able to conclusively prove that the Twin Towers were demolished, is that the towers fell in roughly 10 seconds, that is, that they fell at about the same rate that an object falls through air.
Anyone with a little common sense will realize that the top of a building does not pass through the concrete and steel that comprises the lower portion of the building at the same rate that it falls through air. This just doesn't happen, unless, of course, the lower part of the building has lost its structural integrity (and this is usually due to the detonation of a multitude of small explosive charges as seen in controlled demolitions).
The fact that the towers collapsed in about 10 seconds is a statement that the upper portion of each of the towers passed through the lower portion at about the same rate that it would have fallen through air. The fact that the towers fell this quickly (essentially at the rate of free-fall) is conclusive evidence that they were deliberately demolished.
Believing that there is nothing wrong with the towers collapsing so quickly, is roughly analogous to believing that people pass through closed doors as quickly as they pass through open doors.
The fact that they fell at such a rate means that they encountered essentially no resistance from the supposedly undamaged parts of the structure. That is, no resistance was encountered from any of the immensely strong parts of the structure that had held the building up for the last 30 years. From this one can conclude that the lower undamaged parts were actually very damaged (probably by the detonation of a multitude of small explosive charges as is usual in a controlled demolition).
|
LATEST COMMENTS ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
Listed below are the 10 latest comments of 33 posted about this article.
These comments are anonymously submitted by the website visitors.
| TITLE |
AUTHOR |
DATE |
|
Caezar |
Friday, Sep. 22, 2006 at 4:33 AM |
| (Bill Murray voice) |
It just doesn't matter!!! |
Friday, Jul. 14, 2006 at 7:43 PM |
| conspiracy |
bigjim |
Friday, Jul. 14, 2006 at 6:41 AM |
| Fear |
Cari |
Friday, Apr. 21, 2006 at 7:46 AM |
| My Views |
Peter Christie |
Monday, Apr. 10, 2006 at 3:07 PM |
| Ms |
jinedin |
Sunday, Oct. 24, 2004 at 8:25 AM |
| Mr. |
Roy Fultun |
Thursday, Oct. 14, 2004 at 3:57 PM |
| obviously faked |
educated decision |
Sunday, Sep. 05, 2004 at 1:37 AM |
| professional engineer |
David G. Gowing |
Tuesday, Jul. 13, 2004 at 1:52 AM |
| Controlled Demolition |
Christoper Cross |
Sunday, Jul. 04, 2004 at 1:54 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
